Five slides and six quarterly measures for an AI item at the board, with the recommendation first
What are you asking us to decide?
One sentence a director could repeat at dinner. A sample to adapt:
| Item | Your answer |
|---|---|
| The decisionApprove, fund, stop or change what? | |
| The amount | |
| The date you report back | |
| The one business result it buys |
Can we do this?
Score each pillar from 1 to 5. Readiness is the lowest of the five scores, not their average, because an average lets four strong pillars hide a weak one (the five-pillar assessment).
| Pillar | Score (1 to 5) | Evidence for the score |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy | ||
| Data | ||
| Talent | ||
| Process | ||
| Governance | ||
| ReadinessThe lowest score above, and the pillar it comes from |
What could go wrong?
Three risks, each tied to a system you run. Give the cost as a range and write its assumptions beside it.
| # | Risk | System it sits in | Rule and date | Cost range and assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 |
Dated obligations that apply. One row is filled in as an example; check every date against the legal text before you send.
| Obligation | Applies from | Status | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act, high-risk obligations for uses listed in Annex IIIFor example hiring and credit scoring | 2 December 2027, under Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 | ||
What exactly do you need?
Ask for a stated share of the AI budget, topped up for each high-risk system on slide 3. Do not promise a return multiple.
| Item | Detail | Cost |
|---|---|---|
| Named roles | ||
| Tools | ||
| Top-up for high-risk systems | ||
| Total, and as a share of the AI budget |
Three dated deliverables. By day 90, every AI system should have a place on a list, a record of how it could fail, and a named person who can pause it (Minimum Viable Governance).
| By | Deliverable | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Day 30 | ||
| Day 60 | ||
| Day 90 |
Review turnaround you will promise: a decision on a low-risk use within working days.
How will we know?
The six measures the board sees every quarter. Write the threshold for red, amber and green before launch, and the status as R, A or G. On a phone, the table scrolls sideways.
| Measure | This quarter | Thresholds | R, A or G | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. AI systems in use, by risk tier, with the share that have a current risk assessment and a named owner who can pause them. | ||||
| 2. Systems outside their agreed limits (accuracy, drift, override rate), and how many breached them this quarter. | ||||
| 3. Serious incidents, near misses and complaints or appeals from the people the systems decide about, with the days from detection to the board. | ||||
| 4. Governance review: median days from request to decision, how many reviews required changes or a refusal, and any system that went live without a review. | ||||
| 5. Each dated legal obligation that applies, with its status and owner. | ||||
| 6. Value delivered against the approved business case for each material initiative, with the scale-up or stop decisions due. |
Each red, amber or green against thresholds the board agreed before launch; internal audit or the risk function checks the numbers once a year.
| Item | Your answer |
|---|---|
| Executive accountable for the measures | |
| Next review date | |
| Who checks the numbers, and when |
A small board doesn't need slides. Send one page two days ahead, in the same order, and open the meeting by pointing to the first paragraph.